THE DANISH DISTRIBUTION MODEL FOR REFUGEES: - A study about equity and efficiency in the mechanism of distribution as experienced by Danish municipalities in the Capitol Area
Translated title
DEN DANSKE FORDELINGSMODEL FOR FLYGTNIGNE: - Et studie omhandlende retfærdighed og effektivitet i mekanismerne omkring fordeling, beskrevet subjektivt fra kommunerne i Hovedstadsregionen.
Author
Pedersen, Martin Gry
Term
4. term
Education
Publication year
2016
Submitted on
2016-08-01
Pages
64
Abstract
De seneste ti år er antallet af flygtninge til Danmark steget markant. Derfor er det vigtigt at forstå, hvordan de fordeles, og hvilken belastning det lægger på de modtagende kommuner. Dette speciale beskriver og analyserer den nuværende fordelingsmodel, som Udlændingestyrelsen bruger til at fordele flygtninge mellem danske kommuner, og vurderer, hvad det betyder for retfærdighed og effektivitet. Specialet bygger på kvalitative data: interviews, observationer og sekundær litteratur. Ved at kombinere disse kilder opnås metodetriangulering. Datagrundlaget er relativt lille, men fordi undersøgelsen fokuserer på grundlæggende mekanismer i fordelingen, betragtes nogle resultater som generelle tendenser, mens andre er mere kontekstspecifikke. Analysen anvender teorier om byrdefordeling og kollektive goder, tilpasset den danske kontekst. De centrale begreber er retfærdighed (hvordan ansvar og opgaver fordeles) og effektivitet (hvordan ressourcer udnyttes bedst). En hovedkonklusion er, at der er et misforhold mellem intentionerne bag lovgivning og fordelingsregime og kommunernes praksis. De interviewede kommuner handlede overvejende ud fra en konsekvenslogik, hvor modtagelsen ses som et omkostnings/gevinst-anliggende, mens intentionerne bag ordningen er præget af en passendehedens logik – at gøre det, der opfattes som rigtigt. Specialet viser, hvordan denne forskel påvirker selve fordelingen og får betydning for både retfærdighed og effektivitet. Som en interviewperson udtrykte det, accepterer kommunerne deres del af ansvaret, men må gøre det inden for de vilkår, de er givet. Samlet peger specialet på, at kommunerne møder et idealiseret ønske om fordeling, som i praksis kræver en mere pragmatisk tilgang til modtagelsen af flygtninge.
Over the past decade, the number of refugees arriving in Denmark has risen sharply. It is therefore crucial to understand how people are placed and what burden this puts on receiving municipalities. This thesis describes and analyzes the current allocation model used by the Danish Immigration Service to distribute refugees among Danish municipalities, and assesses what this means for fairness and efficiency. The study draws on qualitative data—interviews, observations, and secondary literature—combined through method triangulation. The empirical sample is relatively small, but because the focus is on core features of the allocation system, some findings are treated as general tendencies while others are more context-specific. The analysis applies theories of burden sharing and public goods, adapted to the Danish context. The key concepts are equity (how responsibilities are distributed fairly) and efficiency (how resources are used well). A main conclusion is that there is a gap between the intentions behind the legislation and allocation regime and municipal practice. The municipalities interviewed largely followed a logic of consequences, viewing reception as a cost–benefit arrangement, while the system’s design and intent reflect a logic of appropriateness—doing what is seen as right. The thesis shows how this discrepancy shapes allocation outcomes and affects both equity and efficiency. As one interviewee noted, municipalities accept their share of the burden but must operate within given constraints. Overall, the study suggests that municipalities face an idealized vision of distribution that, in practice, demands a more pragmatic approach to receiving refugees.
[This abstract was generated with the help of AI]
Keywords
Distribution ; Refugees ; Denmark ; Budensharing ; Equity ; Effeciency ; Qualitative ; Abduction ; Adaptive Methodology
Documents
Other projects by the authors
