Author(s)
Term
4. term
Publication year
2019
Submitted on
2019-05-31
Pages
87 pages
Abstract
Abstract On the 21st of February 2019, the Danish government in cooperation with Danish People’s Party and with support from the Social Democrats passed its new Financial Law. A salient part of the law includes various measures to tighten up conditions for refugees living in Denmark and people seeking asylum. One measure here is a new focus on ‘temporariness,’ which stresses that refugees residing in Denmark are to consider their stay in Denmark temporary and are expected to leave once constitutional conditions permit. This initiative was put into effect before the hearing answer deadline, potentially circumventing scrutiny, and media debate has since then sparked as to the harmful effect such a focus on temporariness can cause for refugees. In this study I research the impact of such temporariness and the uncertainty it brings for Syrian refugee families (parents with children) living in Denmark under the 7.1 status. I do this from a person-centric perspective, with a qualitative, inductive methodology that shreds light on their experiences, perceptions, and points of view through a series of semi-structured interviews. Analysing their statements for themes on overarching sentiments and drawing primarily on Honneth’s theory of recognition and disrespect, I find that the families are impacted in the sense that they feel a sense of anxiety, loss, powerlessness, and injustice following the arrival of the new law. More specifically, they dread a possible future in Syria or outside Denmark, feel that they cannot plan stable life trajectories, be certain that they can realise their developmental ambitions, and worry about the effects on their children, who have come to feel a strong sense of belonging in Denmark. They perceive this as an injustice in regard to the efforts they have made to ‘integrate’ and establish themselves and feel that they given no rights, relegated to a state of powerlessness, in which their future is likely to involve a loss of acquired resources and potential danger. These findings at person-centric level allow for a subsequent discussion in which I contextualise the experiences related in the interviews to the policy change of the new financial law. Afterwards, I include the concept of human security to contrast and critique the law, based on these findings. This is due to human security obligating states to provide circumstances for its citizens and subjects to develop to their full potential, which I find that new financial law hinders, based on the interviews. Finally, in the conclusion, I point towards other areas related to this new shift towards temporariness calling for further research.
Keywords
Documents
Colophon: This page is part of the AAU Student Projects portal, which is run by Aalborg University. Here, you can find and download publicly available bachelor's theses and master's projects from across the university dating from 2008 onwards. Student projects from before 2008 are available in printed form at Aalborg University Library.
If you have any questions about AAU Student Projects or the research registration, dissemination and analysis at Aalborg University, please feel free to contact the VBN team. You can also find more information in the AAU Student Projects FAQs.