Pre-Planning in Construction: Differences in ‘Design-Bid-Build’ and ‘Design-Build’ approaches
Author
Minikevicius, Simonas
Term
4. term
Publication year
2017
Submitted on
2017-01-09
Pages
54
Abstract
Dette studie undersøger forplanlægning i byggeprojekter – det arbejde, der foregår før byggeriet starter, hvor mål, omfang, budget, tidsplan, roller, risici og koordinering fastlægges. Det sammenligner to udbredte entrepriseformer, Design–Bid–Build (DBB) og Design–Build (DB), for at belyse hvordan den tidlige planlægning adskiller sig mellem dem. Undersøgelsen kombinerer en gennemgang af videnskabelige artikler og bøger med forfatterens erhvervserfaring. En teoretisk del kortlægger, hvem der typisk deltager i forplanlægningen, og hvordan processen forløber. På dette grundlag gennemføres en interessentanalyse for at identificere, hvilke aktører der har størst indflydelse og beslutningskraft. Hovedanalysen bygger på kvalitative interviews med bygherrer, entreprenører, rådgivere/konsulenter og designere. Den sammenfatter deres perspektiver, sammenligner praksis i DBB og DB og undersøger aktørroller, indflydelse og samarbejde i den tidlige fase. Studiets resultater samles i konklusionen.
This study examines pre-planning in construction—the work done before building starts to define goals, scope, budget, schedule, roles, risks, and coordination. It compares two common project delivery methods, Design–Bid–Build (DBB) and Design–Build (DB), to show how early planning differs between them. The research combines a review of scientific articles and books with the author's professional experience. A theoretical section maps who typically takes part in pre-planning and how the process unfolds. Based on this foundation, a stakeholder analysis identifies which participants have the most influence and decision power. The main analysis draws on qualitative interviews with owners, contractors, advisors/consultants, and designers. It summarizes their perspectives, compares practices in DBB and DB, and examines stakeholder roles, influence, and collaboration in the early phase. The study’s findings are brought together in the conclusion.
[This abstract was generated with the help of AI]
Keywords
Documents