Irreconcilable Planning Conflict - Urbanisation and Military Training Lands
Author
Rasmussen, Rasmus Bo
Term
4. Term
Publication year
2018
Submitted on
2018-06-08
Pages
34
Abstract
Nationalt forsvars rolle i arealplanlægning er dårligt belyst, og konflikterne omkring den er ofte særlige. Denne undersøgelse ser på øvelsesområdet i Jægerpris og den konflikt, der knytter sig til det, for at klarlægge Forsvarets myndighed og indflydelse i planlægningen. Samtidig bidrager den til at forstå, hvordan agonisme – forstået som uenigheder håndteret gennem fair procedurer – kan bruges til at analysere planlægningskonflikter, der kan være svære at forene. Analysen bygger på Pieter Stallens arbejde, som ser støjkonflikter som sociale begivenheder, Chantal Mouffes begreb om agonisme anvendt som retfærdig procedure, og Torben Dyrbergs magtbegreb til at afdække den sociale side af procedurerne for støjhåndtering. Datagrundlaget er avisartikler og interviews med de vigtigste aktører. Resultaterne viser, at Forsvaret, Frederikssund Kommune og naboerne til øvelsesområdet opfatter støjhåndteringen meget forskelligt. Forskellene viser sig som antagonisme – en fjendtlig modstilling – i selve procedurerne. Forsvarets hegemoni, det vil sige dets dominerende position, skubber andre perspektiver ud af støjhåndteringen og gør konflikten mere fastlåst. Alligevel har Forsvaret frivilligt foretaget visse hensyn, hvilket peger på, at en mere agonistisk dialog kan skabe bedre samarbejde.
The role of national defence in spatial planning is poorly understood, and the conflicts around it are often unique. This study examines the military training area in Jægerpris and the conflict surrounding it to clarify the Danish National Defence’s authority and influence in planning. It also explores how agonism—understood as disagreement managed through fair procedures—can help interpret planning conflicts that may be hard to reconcile. The analysis uses Pieter Stallen’s view of noise disputes as social events, Chantal Mouffe’s concept of agonism applied as fair procedure, and Torben Dyrberg’s concept of power to unpack the social dimension of noise management procedures. The evidence consists of newspaper articles and interviews with the main actors. The findings show that the National Defence, Frederikssund Municipality, and neighbors of the training lands perceive noise management very differently. These differences appear as antagonism—hostile opposition—within the procedures themselves. The hegemony of the National Defence, meaning its dominant position, tends to exclude other perspectives from noise management and further entrenches the conflict. Despite this hegemony, the National Defence has made voluntary accommodations, indicating potential for agonistic discussion to support better cooperation.
[This abstract was generated with the help of AI]
Keywords
Documents