Author(s)
Term
4. term
Education
Publication year
2020
Submitted on
2020-05-29
Pages
56 pages
Abstract
The present thesis analyses the case of Humanitarian Corridors, a humanitarian project born in 2015 in Italy as an answer to the thousands of drownings happening just off of Italian shores. It is the result of a collaboration between various faith-based organisations and the Italian government. This project is often held in high regard and is considered to be good practice. Moreover, it follows a different trend than the mainly negative mindset of securitisation and externalisation practices that many European countries hold. There is a gap in existing literature on studies that critically assess the project of Humanitarian Corridors; refusing to take the project’s authors’ motivations behind the creation of the project at face value, this thesis examines the grounds for the project’s conception and its consequences on how the project functions operationally. Thus, the aim is to answer the following research questions: why was the project of Humanitarian Corridors conceived? and secondly did the reasons for its conception lead to any consequences on how the project is implemented and run? If so, which ones? The research consists of a single-case study relying on qualitative data collected through document analysis and one semi-structured, informative interview. The collected material has been analysed through the works of Didier Fassin and Michael Barnett that critically assesses and scrutinises the concept of humanitarianism. Their works shed light on Humanitarian Corridors’ controversial dynamics and offered the instruments to criticise them while also acknowledging their positive impact. Therefore, this thesis’ strength lies in the fact that it looks critically at the project, refusing to adhere either to an overly romanticised or to an overly sceptical vision of its humanitarian nature. The analysis showed that Humanitarian Corridors were conceived not only to offer asylum seekers safe and legal access to Italy, but also for the founding faith-based organisations to prove their own goodwill. This secondary ‘goal’ affected the choice of the prioritised selection criteria: the beneficiaries’ vulnerability and their potential for integration. These criteria arguably turned out to be means of exclusion. Moreover, due to necessitating the authority of the Italian government in issuing the visas for the beneficiaries to legally access Italy, the formation of a partnership between the government and the organisations turned Humanitarian Corridors into an externalisation tool to admit only a few, carefully selected beneficiaries in the name of a need for security.
Keywords
Documents
Colophon: This page is part of the AAU Student Projects portal, which is run by Aalborg University. Here, you can find and download publicly available bachelor's theses and master's projects from across the university dating from 2008 onwards. Student projects from before 2008 are available in printed form at Aalborg University Library.
If you have any questions about AAU Student Projects or the research registration, dissemination and analysis at Aalborg University, please feel free to contact the VBN team. You can also find more information in the AAU Student Projects FAQs.