En retlig analyse af Den Uafhængige Politiklagemyndigheds sagsbehandling i klagesager over polititjenestemænd samt betydningen af overtrædelsens grovhed i forhold til disciplinærsanktionen.

A legal analysis of the Danish Independent Police Complaints Commissions case man-agement in regards complaints about policemen and the gravity of the impact the dif-ferent violations have on the disciplinary sanctions.

Rasmussen, Katrine Skaarup ; Davtyan, Shushanik

4. semester

Jura, Kandidat

2018

2018-05-17

67

Denne kandidatafhandling foretager en retlig analyse af Den Uafhængige Politiklagemyndigheds (DUP’s) sagsbehandling i klagesager over polititjenestemænd og belyser, hvordan overtrædelsens grovhed påvirker valget af disciplinærsanktion. Med udgangspunkt i oprettelsen af DUP pr. 1. januar 2012 og overførslen af opgaver fra statsadvokaturen beskrives kompetencefordelingen: DUP undersøger påstande om strafferetlige overtrædelser, mens anklagemyndigheden afgør tiltalespørgsmålet; i adfærdsklager undersøger og afgør DUP, om der skal udtales kritik. Afhandlingen gennemgår borgerens klageadgang og centrale afgrænsninger af begreber som “adfærd”, “i tjeneste”, “overfor en borger” og “politimyndighed”, samt sagsgange og polititjenestemandens rettigheder under behandlingen. Der redegøres for disciplinære reaktioner efter tjenestemandslovgivningen—fra advarsel og irettesættelse over bøde til forflyttelse, degradering og afskedigelse—med særlig vægt på grænsetilfælde og proportionalitet i sanktionsvalget. Metodisk anvendes klassisk juridisk metode med analyse af lovgivning, forarbejder, retspraksis, administrativ praksis og kommissionsberetninger. Som illustrativt casestudie behandles den såkaldte Tibet-sag (2012–2014) om politiets indgriben i demonstrationer i forbindelse med kinesiske diplomatbesøg for at diskutere mulige retlige kvalifikationer og tænkelige disciplinære konsekvenser. De endelige resultater og konkrete konklusioner præsenteres senere i afhandlingen og kan ikke udledes fuldt ud af dette uddrag.

This thesis offers a legal analysis of the Danish Independent Police Complaints Authority’s (DUP) case handling in complaints against police officers and examines how the gravity of an offence influences the choice of disciplinary sanction. Following the establishment of DUP on 1 January 2012 and the transfer of responsibilities from the regional prosecutors, the thesis outlines the division of competences: DUP investigates alleged criminal violations by police officers while the prosecution decides on charging; in conduct complaints, DUP investigates and decides whether to issue criticism. The thesis maps citizens’ access to complain and clarifies key notions such as “conduct,” “on duty,” “towards a citizen,” and “police authority,” as well as case procedures and the officer’s procedural rights. It surveys disciplinary measures under civil service rules—from warnings and reprimands through fines to transfer, demotion, and dismissal—with a focus on borderline cases and proportionality in sanctioning. Methodologically, it applies a doctrinal legal approach drawing on legislation, preparatory works, case law, administrative decisions, and commission reports. As an illustrative case study, it analyzes the so‑called Tibet case (2012–2014) concerning police interventions during demonstrations linked to visits by Chinese diplomats, to discuss possible legal classifications and likely disciplinary responses. Definitive findings and concrete conclusions are presented later in the thesis and cannot be fully inferred from this excerpt.

[Dette resumé er genereret med hjælp fra AI direkte fra projektet fuldtekst]

Download PDF
Vis denne rapport i AAU Studenterprojekter

Rasmussen, Katrine Skaarup:

• A legal analysis of the Danish Independent Police Complaints Commissions case man-agement in regards complaints about policemen and the gravity of the impact the dif-ferent violations have on the disciplinary sanctions. (2018)

Davtyan, Shushanik:

• A legal analysis of the Danish Independent Police Complaints Commissions case man-agement in regards complaints about policemen and the gravity of the impact the dif-ferent violations have on the disciplinary sanctions. (2018)