En retlig analyse af Den Uafhængige Politiklagemyndigheds sagsbehandling i klagesager over polititjenestemænd samt betydningen af overtrædelsens grovhed i forhold til disciplinærsanktionen.

A legal analysis of the Danish Independent Police Complaints Commissions case man-agement in regards complaints about policemen and the gravity of the impact the dif-ferent violations have on the disciplinary sanctions.

Rasmussen, Katrine Skaarup ; Davtyan, Shushanik

4. semester

Jura, Kandidat

2018

2018-05-16

67

Afhandlingen foretager en retlig analyse af Den Uafhængige Politiklagemyndigheds (Politiklagemyndighedens) sagsbehandling i klagesager over polititjenestemænd og undersøger, hvordan overtrædelsens grovhed påvirker valget af disciplinærsanktion. Efter en kort historik om oprettelsen af Politiklagemyndigheden i 2012 og dens rolle i forhold til statsadvokaturen beskrives borgerens klageadgang og centrale afgrænsninger (hvad der forstås ved adfærd, i tjeneste, over for en borger og politimyndighed), sagsforløbet samt den indklagede polititjenestemands rettigheder. Afhandlingen gennemgår dernæst rammerne for disciplinærsager i politiet og sanktionsskalaen fra afskedigelse, degradering og forflyttelse til bøde, irettesættelse og advarsel, herunder grænsetilfælde og notitssager. Metodisk bygger projektet på en juridisk (doktrinær) analyse af lovgivning, retspraksis, administrativ praksis, kommissionsberetninger og juridisk litteratur. Tibet-sagen anvendes som illustrativ case til at belyse mulige lovovertrædelser, Politiklagemyndighedens rolle og overvejelser om passende disciplinærreaktioner. Afhandlingen søger overordnet at tydeliggøre de kriterier, der styrer vurderingen af klager og proportionaliteten mellem forseelsens grovhed og sanktionen; konkrete resultater og konklusioner fremgår ikke af dette uddrag.

This thesis offers a legal analysis of the Danish Independent Police Complaints Authority’s case handling of complaints against police officers and examines how the gravity of a violation influences the choice of disciplinary sanction. After outlining the Authority’s establishment in 2012 and its division of roles with the regional prosecutors, the thesis explains citizens’ access to complain and key thresholds (what counts as conduct, on duty, towards a citizen, and police authority), the case process, and the rights of the officer under investigation. It then sets out the framework for disciplinary cases in the police and the spectrum of sanctions—from dismissal, demotion, and transfer to fine, reprimand, and warning—including borderline distinctions and note cases. Methodologically, the work is a doctrinal legal analysis drawing on legislation, case law, administrative practice, commission reports, and legal scholarship. The Tibet case is used as an illustrative example to discuss possible legal violations, the Authority’s role, and considerations about appropriate disciplinary responses. Overall, the thesis clarifies criteria guiding complaint assessments and the proportionality between seriousness and sanction; specific results and conclusions are not contained in this excerpt.

[Dette resumé er genereret med hjælp fra AI direkte fra projektet (PDF)]

Download
Vis denne rapport i AAU Studenterprojekter

Rasmussen, Katrine Skaarup:

• A legal analysis of the Danish Independent Police Complaints Commissions case man-agement in regards complaints about policemen and the gravity of the impact the dif-ferent violations have on the disciplinary sanctions. (2018)

Davtyan, Shushanik:

• A legal analysis of the Danish Independent Police Complaints Commissions case man-agement in regards complaints about policemen and the gravity of the impact the dif-ferent violations have on the disciplinary sanctions. (2018)