AAU Student Projects - visit Aalborg University's student projects portal
A master's thesis from Aalborg University
Book cover


Comparative analysis on the methods for determination of consolidation and creep parameters using custom software

Author

Term

4. term

Publication year

2018

Submitted on

Pages

146

Abstract

Sætninger i jorden er særligt vigtige i Danmark, hvor der findes mange glacialt overkonsoliderede ler. Disse jorder er tidligere sammenpresset af is og udviser ofte høj kryb, dvs. langsomme, fortsatte deformationer over tid. Det har stor betydning for langtidsvurderinger af konstruktioner, der er følsomme over for sætninger. Forskellige testmetoder og tolkninger gør analyser af konsolidering (hvordan jorden komprimeres under last) og kryb komplekse og vanskelige at sammenligne. For at ensrette arbejdet er der udviklet et fortolkningsprogram, MASCoT, som standardiserer ind- og uddata fra forskellige metoder og dermed gør det lettere at sammenligne resultater og tolke parametre fra flere forsøg. Programmet anvendes på danske konsolideringsforsøg. Studiet beskriver og diskuterer forskelle, særpræg og begrænsninger ved de valgte metoder samt ved selve jordprøverne, og hvordan disse forhold påvirker tolkningen.

Settlement of the ground is especially important in Denmark, which has many glacial over-consolidated clays. These soils were previously compressed by ice and often show high creep—slow, ongoing deformation over time. This matters for long-term assessments of structures that are sensitive to settlement. Different testing and interpretation approaches make analyses of consolidation (how soil compresses under load) and creep complex and hard to compare. To address this, an interpretation tool, MASCoT, was developed to standardize inputs and outputs across methods, making it easier to compare results and interpret parameters from multiple tests. The program is applied to Danish consolidation test data. The study describes and discusses the differences, specific features, and limitations of the selected methods and of the soil samples, and how these factors affect interpretation.

[This abstract was generated with the help of AI]