Skelforretninger i praksis: - Redegørelse, diskussion og vurdering af de erfarne landinspektørers praksis

Abstract

Udgangspunktet for rapporten er en antagelse om, at det lave antal skelforretninger i Danmark, gør det vanskeligt for landinspektører at få erfaring med og derved opbygge rutine i forhold til at gennemføre skelforretninger. Denne manglende erfaring er uhensigtsmæssigt, da landinspektøren ved en skelforretning træffer en domstolslignende afgørelse, hvilket stiller store krav til landinspektørens kompetencer. Rapportens foranalyse verificerer antagelsen om, at der fortsat gennemføres relativt få skelforretninger, samtidig med at det klarlægges, at disse er fordelt på mange firmaer og mange landinspektører. På den baggrund er det relevant at kvalificere kendskabet til praksis på området, hvilket sker ved at indsamle erfaring og viden hos de mest erfarne landinspektører på området. Det sker konkret gennem kvalitative interviews af 6 udvalgte landinspektører. Igennem projektets problemanalyse foretages en grundig redegørelse for praksis, der kan give urutinerede så vel som rutinerede landinspektører indblik i, hvordan en skelforretning gribes an i praksis. Udover redegørelsen for praksis, analyseres, diskuteres og vurderes den indsamlede viden med henblik på at klarlægge de mest hensigtsmæssige fremgangsmåder. Med udgangspunkt i dette vurderes ligeledes, hvorvidt landinspektørerne agerer i overensstemmelse med regelsættet. Ud fra disse vurderinger fremsættes endvidere forbedringsforlag til regelsættet. Overordnet kan der konstateres en stor grad af konsensus mellem praksis og reglerne på området, ligesom praksis de enkelte landinspektører imellem i store træk også stemmer overens. På visse områder kan praksis dog kritiseres. Rapporten klarlægger eksempelvis, at landinspektørernes praksis i forhold til oplysning om retshjælpsforsikring generelt er yderst mangelfuld på trods af, at det vil være ansvarspådragende for landinspektøren at forsømme oplysning om dette. På den baggrund foreslås bekendtgørelsen om skelforretninger tilføjet krav om, at landinspektøren skal oplyse parterne om mulighederne for retshjælpsdækning. Afslutningsvis opsummeres anbefalingerne, der er foretaget gennem rap-porten, hvilket resulterer i en model for gennemførelse af skelforretninger.

The starting point of the report is the hypothesis that the low number of boundary determination processes in Denmark makes it difficult for the chartered surveyors to gain experience with boundary determination processes and in that way build up routines in relation to completing them. This lack of experience is inexpedient, because a chartered surveyor makes a court-like decision in a boundary determination process, something which makes heavy demands on the chartered surveyor’s qualifications. The pre-analysis of the report verifies the hypothesis that still relatively few boundary determination processes are completed, at the same time it is verified that these are divided among many firms and many chartered surveyors. In the light of this it is relevant to qualify the knowledge of practice within the area, which is done by collecting experiences and knowledge from the most experienced chartered surveyors. Concretely this is made through qualitative interviews with six selected chartered surveyors. Through the problem analysis of the project a thorough account of practice is given, something that will give inexperienced as well as experienced chartered surveyors an insight into how a boundary determination process may be addressed in practice. In addition to the account of practice given, the collected knowledge is analysed, discussed and evaluated with a view to elucidating the most expedient procedures. On the basis of this it is likewise evaluated whether the chartered surveyors act according to the rules and regulations. Sugge-stions for improvement of the regulations are offered based on the above mentioned evaluations. Overall there is a considerable degree of consensus between practice and re-gulations within the area, just as practice among each one of the chartered surveyors is also roughly consistent. Within certain areas practice may be criticised. For instance the report explains that the chartered surveyors’ practice in relation to informing about legal aid insurance is generally very insufficient, despite the fact that they would incur responsibility by neglecting to inform about this. In the light of this it is suggested that the chartered surveyor must inform the parties about the possibilities of legal aid coverage by adding requirements of this to the ministerial order on boundary determination processes. Finally the recommendations that are made throughout the report are summed up, resulting in a model for completion of boundary determination processes.

A master thesis from Aalborg University

Skelforretninger i praksis: - Redegørelse, diskussion og vurdering af de erfarne landinspektørers praksis

[Boundary determination processes in practice: - account, discussion and evaluation of the experienced chartered surveyors practice]