AAU Student Projects - visit Aalborg University's student projects portal
An executive master's programme thesis from Aalborg University
Book cover


Sense of Direction in Maps: Can “Less is More” be Enough to Understand a Familiar Environment through Landmark and Survey Knowledge?

Author

Term

4. term

Publication year

2017

Pages

96

Abstract

Specialet undersøger, om kort der kun viser landemærker, stadig er lette at forstå. Landemærker er markante steder, som hjælper folk med at orientere sig. Med afsæt i geokommunikation (hvordan kort formidler information) samt viden om kognitive kort og rumlig læring (hvordan vi mentalt repræsenterer og lærer steder), blev deltagere bedt om at bruge forenklede kort til at finde placeringen af et landemærke, der ikke var vist. En online spørgeskemaundersøgelse præsenterede tre landemærke-fokuserede kortdesigns for tre danske byer. Resultaterne varierede efter design: cirka halvdelen fandt korrekt frem til det skjulte landemærke med ét design, cirka en tredjedel med et andet, og kun omkring 1% med det tredje. Det peger på, at for meget forenkling gør kort sværere at bruge—her gælder det, at mindre ikke er mere. Et forstudie af, hvordan man kommunikerer med kort, der kun viser landemærker, gav også forslag til forbedringer af fremtidige kortdesign og undersøgelsesoplæg.

This thesis investigates whether maps that show only landmarks can still be easy to understand. Landmarks are notable places that help people orient themselves. Drawing on geocommunication (how maps convey information) and research on cognitive maps and spatial learning (how people mentally represent and learn places), the study asked participants to use simplified maps to infer the location of a landmark that was not shown. An online survey presented three landmark-focused map designs for three Danish cities. Overall, results varied by design: about half of respondents correctly located the hidden landmark with one design, about one third with another, and only about 1% with the third. These findings suggest that, in this case, removing too much information makes maps harder to use—less is not more. A preliminary study of how to communicate with landmark-only maps also led to suggestions for improving future map designs and study setups.

[This abstract was generated with the help of AI]