- Dennis Walther Nielsen
- Patrick Brøndum Jensen
4. semester, Sports Science, Master (Master Programme)
Introduction: According to literature, the evaluation form in physical education in
the Danish high schools is recognized as being informal and characterized by a lack
of standards. Because of this, the students have a tendency to feel a lack of clarification
about the curriculum objectives. A possible result of this is that some students
get frustrated when they are giving their grades in physical education. To accommodate
this issue, some high schools implement final course tests, in the hope that this
will clarify the objectives in the physical education lessons and provide teachers with
grading evidence. In this matter, literature indicates that student’s motivation for
physical education is affected by different factors, such as tests.
Objective: The objective of this study was to examine in which way high school students
are motivated in physical education, when a final course test is implemented.
Methods: The present study was performed as a qualitative case study. The case
consisted of a 1.g class from a Danish high school and 17 students (6 boys & 11 girls)
participated in this study. The empirical findings were gathered over a course of four
lessons (time: 4 weeks – one lesson each week). The course was initiated with the
teacher giving the students information about the final course test, and that the test
would be included in the grading. The data for this present study was collected from
video observations from each lesson, an individual student-logbook from each lesson,
and interviews. After the course an interview was held with the teacher, and two
group interviews were held with the students. In the group interviews there were 15
out of the 17 students present. In the group interviews the Stimulated Recall Method
(STR) (Patrikainen, Toom, & Vesterinen, 2010) was used, were each student was
presented with a video clip of him or her from one of the video observations. In the
analysis of the data, themes and categories were made, from the individual studentlog
books and the group interviews.
Results: The analysis indicated that the implementation of the final course test effected
the student’s motivation. The data indicated that the student’s motivation could
be divided in five categories: 1. The students had a need for feedback. 2. The students
had a need for competence, relatedness, and flow. 3. The student’s goals were task6
and performance oriented. 4. The final course test promoted nervousness and performance
anxiety. 5. The final course test increased the student’s focus on grades. The
results indicated that the final course test supported more clarification about the objectives
of the course. The results indicated that the students primarily were extern
motivated in the course, and that students goals primarily were task oriented in the
first three lessons and performance oriented in the last lesson with the final course
test.
Conclusion: The study concludes that when implementing a final course test, the
students are externally motivated by the anticipation of rewards, such as grades. The
study also concludes that the final course test encouraged the students to adopt a performance
goal perspective. The study also concludes that the final course test is likely
to clarify the teacher’s curriculum objectives in the course. The study also concludes
that the students are motivated by their perception of their ability to accomplish in the
task they are given. In this matter, the findings suggest that the final course test promotes
nervousness and performance anxiety among the students. As a result of this
the student’s perception of ability is negatively affected and this indicates to have a
negatively affect on the student’s motivation.
Keywords: Motivation, Physical Education, Final course test, Students, Self-
Determination Theory, Achievement Goal Theory, Self-efficacy, Flow Theory.
Language | Danish |
---|---|
Publication date | 5 Jan 2016 |