Landzoneadministrationen

Abstract

Projektet tager udgangspunkt i ændringen af planlovens landzonebestemmelser i 2002, hvormed kommunerne blev landzonemyndighed i hele landet. Hertil blev det i den offentlige debat og folke-tingssalen anført, at kommunerne ville føre en mindre restriktiv landzoneadministration til skade for miljø, natur og landskab. Indtil videre har det dog ikke været muligt entydigt at afgøre, om kommunerne har været mere lempelige end amterne. Øget byggeri og ændret anvendelse er dog heller ikke i sig selv problema-tisk, men det er uheldigt, hvis kommunerne ikke varetager de hensyn, de skal ved afgørelser efter landzonebestemmelserne. Gennem en analyse af Naturklagenævnets kendelser kan det konstateres, at der er visse proble-mer i forhold til varetagelsen af de planlægningsmæssige, landskabelige og naturbeskyttelses-mæssige hensyn. Eksempelvis ved at der gives landzonetilladelser til byggeri, der bør placeres, hvor der gennem planlægningen er åbnet op for dette eller ved, at regionplanens retningslinier om-handlende landskab og natur tilsidesættes. Med strukturreformen sker der en fundamental ændring af det danske plan- og reguleringssystem, idet det regionale led kraftigt decimeres. Kommunen får i denne forbindelse et langt større spille-rum i forhold til landzoneadministrationen, da de overtager planlægningskompetencen i det åbne land og dermed selv skal udarbejde grundlaget for landzoneadministration. Staten får øgede sty-ringsmuligheder over for kommunerne, men staten forventes ikke at have incitament til at gribe ind i kommunernes konkrete kommuneplanlægning og administration af landzonebestemmelserne. Først hvis der med tiden kan spores nogle generelle problemstillinger, forventes staten at gribe in-de gennem de generelle styringsmuligheder.

This thesis is based on the amendments of the planning act in 2002, which meant that the munici-pality became regulatory authority of the rural areas in Denmark. Following these amendments concern was expressed that the municipal authority would lead a less restrictive administration of the rural areas causing damage to the environment, nature and landscape. So far, it has not been possible without ambiguity to determine whether the municipality has been less restrictive than the county authorities. However, an increase in new buildings or change of use, in the rural areas is not in itself problematic. The problems arise, if the municipality does not take the proper considerations into account when they grant permission to new buildings or change of use in the rural areas. An analysis of the rulings by The Nature Protection Board of Appeal shows that certain problems occur in relation to the following considerations: Planning, landscape and nature. For instance per-mits in rural areas are given to residential units, commercial buildings and holiday houses instead of placing such activities in planned areas. Furthermore it seems to be a general problem that the guidelines of the regional plan concerning nature and landscape are often being flouted The reform of municipal structures entails a fundamental change, since the importance of the re-gional authority will be diminished. The latitude of the municipal authority will increase concerning the administration of the rural areas, since they will be empowered to plan for the rural areas. The opportunities of the state to control the municipality will increase, however it is not to be expected, that the state will have incentive to intervene in the specific planning and administration of the rural areas. The state will only intervene if general problems occur.

A master thesis from Aalborg University

Landzoneadministrationen