AAU Studenterprojekter - besøg Aalborg Universitets studenterprojektportal
A master thesis from Aalborg University

Lov og policy på integrationsområdet i Danmark og Sverige: En komparativ analyse

[Integration in Denmark and Sweden: A comparative analysis of legislation and policy]

Forfatter(e)

Semester

4. semester

Uddannelse

Udgivelsesår

2011

Afleveret

2011-06-27

Antal sider

144 pages

Abstract

ABSTRACT Within the last decades migration and integration have been public and political debate issues. Not only have focus been on participation within the labour market, but lately the focus on participation within the political and social life have led to renewed legislation and actions, directed at newly arrived immigrants in Denmark and Sweden. The changes in legislation is not only a sign of changes in the overall integration policy, but also of significant meaning to the field of social work as it sets the frame for the execution of the social work per se. This Master thesis explores policies on integration in two quite similar Scandinavian countries; Denmark and Sweden. Despite the two nations similarities when it comes to the welfare structure, there are supposedly significant differences in their policy on integration. Where Sweden has been known for their open and multicultural policy, Denmark have had a reputation of being more restrictive and focused on the prevention of further immigration. Through an analysis of not only the historical background, but also the current legislation and actions, this Master thesis seeks to uncover the similarities and differences between the two countries, and to outline the consequences of these differences and similarities for the field of social work. This is done by a comparison of the two nations policies, legislation, and migrant history for then to place the integration policy of each country on a continuum between assimilation and segregation. By doing so, it is possible to draw out the specific framework and aims of social work in the field of integration. We have found it necessary to divide the analyses in three mutually coherent areas; the preliminary analysis is more descriptive in its form, and gives an overview of the historical and current differences in legislation and social programmes. The second part of the analysis includes theory about the policy process and the meaning of claims making. This part of the analysis seeks to explain the cause of the differences identified in the first part. The third and last part of the analysis debates the current conditions, under which social workers carries out their tasks, and the implications of further restrictions in policy and legislation and the consequences for the ethical guidelines of the practical execution of social work. The results of the analysis points to a significant difference between the Danish and Swedish integration policies and legislation. This is not only the case when it comes to the content of the law, where the Danish version is much more detailed and restrictive, but also when it comes to the purpose of the law, which is expressed implicitly in the formulated set of values and terms in the introduction programmes for immigrants. In a whole, this Master thesis draws the conclusion that, even though the two nations represents almost similar welfare regimes, their policies on integration and criteria for civil citizenship differs significantly, although the differences tend to diminish with the increase of liberal politics. It is clear, that these tendencies have a major impact on the conditions, under which social work is carried out and develops over time. Therefore it should be considered, whether the definition of 'social work' should be adjusted to the new circumstances. When social problems can be characterised as contextual construction, it can be seen as necessary to apply the same dynamic view to concept of social

Within the last decades migration and integration have been public and political debate issues. Not only have focus been on participation within the labor market, but lately the focus on participation within the political and social life have led to renewed legislation and actions, directed at newly arrived immigrants in Denmark and Sweden. The changes in legislation is not only a sign of changes in the overal integration policy, but also of significant meaning to the field of social work as it sets the frame for the excecution of the social work per se. This master thesis explores policy on integration in two quite similar scandinavian countries; Denmark and Sweden. Dispite the two nations similarities when it comes to the welfarestructure, there are supposedly significant differencies in their policy on integration. Where Sweden has been known for ther quite open and multicultural policy, Denmark have had a reputation of been more restriktive and a policy focused on the prevention of further immigration. Through an analysis of not only the historical background, but also the current legislation and actions, this master thesis seeks to uncover the similarities and differencies between the two countries, and to outline the consequenses of theese differencies and similarities for the field of social work. This is done by a comparrison of the two nations policies, legislation, migrant history and through this place the integration policy of each country on a continuum between assimilation and segregation. By doing so, it is possible to draw out the specific framework and aims of social work in the field of integration. We have found it necessary to divide the analyses in three mutally coherent areas; The preliminary analysis is more descriptive in its form, and gives an overview of the hisorical and current differencies in legislation and social programmes. The second part of the analysis draws upon theory about the policyprocess and the meaning of claimsmaking. This part of the analysis seeks to explain the cause of the differencies indentified in the first part. The third and last part of the analysis debates the current conditions, under which social workers carries out their tasks, and the implications of further restriktions in policy and legislation on the ethical guidelines for the practical execution of social work. The results of the analysis points to quite a big difference between the Danish and Swedish integraion policy and integration. This is not only the case when it somes to the content of the law, where the Danish version is much more detailed and restrictive, but also when it comes to the purpose of the law, wich is expressed implicitly in the formulated set of values and terms in the introductionary programmes for immigrants. In a whole, this master thesis drwas the conclusion that, eventhough the two nations repressents almost similar welfareregimes, their policy on integration and criteria for civil citizenship differs significantly, although the differences tend to dimishes with the increase of liberal politics. It is quite clear, that these tendenses have a major impact on the conditions, under wich social work is carried out and develops over time. Therefore it should be considered, whether the defintion of 'social work' should be adjusted to the new circumstances. When social problems can be caracterised as contextual construction, it can be seen as necessary to apply the same dynamic view to concept of social work.

Emneord

Dokumenter


Kolofon: Denne side er en del af AAU Studenterprojekter — Aalborg Universitets studenterprojektportal. Her kan du finde og downloade offentligt tilgængelige kandidatspecialer og masterprojekter fra hele universitetet fra 2008 og frem. Studenterprojekter fra før 2008 kan findes i trykt form på Aalborg Universitetsbibliotek.

Har du spørgsmål til AAU Studenterprojekter eller Aalborg Universitets forskningsregistrering, formidling og analyse, er du altid velkommen til at kontakte VBN-teamet. Du kan også læse mere i AAU Studenterprojekter FAQ.